اختصاص دادن دو رنگ خاکستری و سیاه به رژیم

تا کنون بسیاری از هم میهنان عزیز تلاش کرده اند تا راه حلی برای متحد کردن ارائه بدهند. استفاده از رنگ و یا هر علامت مشخصی دیگر متاسفانه غیر ممکنه زیرا رژِیم افراد را به بهانه های بسیار پیش پا افتاده مورد ضرب و شتم قرار میده و گاهی هم اعدام می کنه چه برسه به اینکه یکیو پیدا کنه که مثلن رنگ و علامت انقلاب هم همراهش باشه.

به نظر من بجای اینکه به انقلاب رنگ بدیم بهتره به رژیم و هوادارانش رنگ بدیم. انتخاب رنگ هم احتیاج نیست زیرا دو رنگ هستند که رنگ اصلی رژیمند. این دو رنگ خاکستری و سیاه هستند. به اینصورت که هرکس با رژیم مخالفه هر چه لباس به این رنگها را داره را در زباله دان بریزه و هرگز از این دو رنگ استفاده نکنه. این تنها هزینه ای است که میباید بپردازه.

رژیم هم هرگز نمی تونه کسی را به جرم اینکه در این طرح شرکت کرده دستگیر کنه یا اذیت و آزار بده. چون تا این طرح کاملن عمومی بشه مدت ها طول میکشه و مردم می توانند بگویند که از چنین طرحی اصلن خبر ندارند. و وقتی هم که عمومی بشه تعداد آنقدر زیاده که رژیم هیچ غلطی نمی تونه بکنه. بعد از اینکه این طرح عمومی بشه آنوقت معلوم میشه که این رژیم جنایتکار چند نفر حامی داره.
این طرح می تونه خودش یک رفراندوم باشه. بجای اینکه از مردم بخواهیم لباس غیر سیاه و خاکستری بپوشند از آنها می خواهیم با پوشیدن لباس های سیاه و خاکستری حمایت خود را از رژیم اعلام کنند.

نظر شما چیست؟

In recent revolutions, a colour or a symbol has been used to unify the people against the dictatorial regimes. In Poland, the 'Solidarity' symbol and in Ukraine the colour orange was used. Many Iranians have pondered whether the Iranian revolution against the Mullah's regime should have a symbol or a colour. Unfortunately, this will not work for the Iranians. The regime is so brutal that in order to crush any dissent, it is terrorising the nation for reasons such as bad Hijab or simply being unemployed and out on the street. It is obvious that Iranians could not carry a revolutionary symbol. That would be a certain arrest and possible execution. So what should be done to unify the people.

I suggest instead of giving the revolution a colour, we give the Mullahs' regime and its supporters colour/s. The colours of the regime are black and grey. Anyone who opposes the regime should avoid these colours and throw away any clothes in these colours and never wear them again. The regime cannot arrest people or harras people for not wearing these colours. People could simply claim that they have not heard of the scheme or simply have never had clothes in these colours. The risk to the people for participating in this scheme is absolutely zero. Yet, the effect can be incredible. Just imagine! The benefits of this initiative, once popularised, will include: the regime will see how many people actually support them, and this can be a kind of referendum; once this scheme is established, the people will see how many 'Mokhalef' (opposed) there are in any gathering of people. For example, when there are say a few hundred people around, this will give people more confidence; by participating in this scheme, people are fighting the regime without going out of their way; and many more benefits without any risk whatsoever.

I would like to know your opinion.

ما انسانیم و تمامی حقوق انسانی "حق مسلم" ماست

سایت تغییر برای برابری

به مناسبت اولین سالگرد کمپین یک میلیون امضاء برای تغییر قوانین تبعیض آمیز

ما مگر چه می خواهیم که از حضور ما در جامعه وحشت می کنید؟

سرکردگان و رادان!
پیام ارعاب و تعریض خشونت را دریافتیم. این نخستین بار نیست که می بایست زیر باران سرب و سنگ، تهمت و ننگ را تاب آریم و دل به صبوری بسپاریم.
سال هاست که دخترانمان را با جامه ی دریده و دست وپای مجروح ازتازیانه ، ازچنگ گزمگان بیرون کشیده ایم.
سال هاست که پسرانمان را با سرتراشیده و چهره ی نیلی ازضربت سیلی، از آستانه ی درخانه به آغوش کشیده ایم .
گناه دختران کاستن درازی دامان و خطای پسران آراستن کوتاهی زلف بوده است !
آیا برای درهم شکستن ما، بیست وهشت سال آزمون ناکام شما کافی نبوده است ؟
پیش ستم، پایدار ایستاده ایم و کینه به دل راه نداده ایم، زیرا که ما زاده ایم شمایان را .
و شما بر شاخه نشسته اید و بر بن تبر می زنید و این بد، نه بر ما که بر نفس خود می کنید!
آینده داور ماست.
سیمین بهبهانی
ما زن هستیم
ما مادر هستیم
ما همسر هستیم
ما خواهر هستیم
آرزوهایمان بزرگ نیستند،جهان شما کوچک است.به همین دلیل میپنداریم :
سکوت ننگ است
ای هم جنس و هم تبار من!
بیا آگاه باشیم- بیا استوار همچون سخره ها و پرشور چون پیوند رودهای خروشان برای رفع تبعیض و برابر حقوقی از یکدیگر حمایت کنیم.
ما انسانیم وتمامی حقوق انسانی" حق مسلم" ماست.
ما امضاء کنندگان، ضمن خسته نباشید به همه کوشندگان این کمپین بار دیگر حمایت خود را برای تغییر قوانین تبعیض آمیز اعلام میداریم.

حمایت از زنان ایران

http://www.gopetition.com/online/14031/sign.html

The Dark World of Religion

دنیای سیاه دین

Islamic Regime Given Time to Suppress Revolution

Within enchained nations that are ruled by tyrants, there are very few who have the courage to stand up and fight for their rights and liberties. Even though the majority are usually hateful towards their regime and would like to see the back of them, most people for the fear of getting arrested, persecuted or executed stay silent and passive. They would only join in the fight for their own liberation towards the end of the battle when they are certain that the tyrant's repressive machinery is almost dead. The passive masses are usually led by the courageous few who pave the way and show that it is safe to come out on to the street to demonstrate.

The Islamist tyrants in Iran in the last twelve months or so have stepped up their arresting, persecuting and executing anyone they consider to have the potentials to lead the masses on to the streets to demonstrate. Hundreds of thousands of people including university students, workers, and young unemployed have been arrested some falsely charged imprisoned or executed. The Islamic regime has been able to do this because its repressive machinery known as, the IRGC acronym for the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, and all of its branches have had nothing much else to do apart from training and supplying their affiliates in Iraq, Afghanistan and Lebanon. Harassing and arresting unarmed and untrained civilians doesn't require much when there are only a few of them at the time.

Do those who say "talk to the regime" understand that by advocating for this approach, they are doing a great disfavour to the Iranian people by giving the Islamic regime plenty of time and space to take out the revolutionary leaders and further suppress the people of Iran and a great disfavour to their own safety as the regime is relentlessly pursuing nuclear technology and bombs?

When Ahmadinejad was campaigning for the presidential dog and pony show, only a couple of years ago, the threat of military action against his master's regime was looming and he had no doubt that his own foreign policies, i.e. the "wiping of Israel off the map" and "the nuclear technology is our absolute right" would cause international outrage and the possibilities of military actions would be even greater. During his campaign he said "My government is the government of Justice, equality, love and kindness" he said "I would bring the oil dividends on to your food cloth". In an interview on TV his answer to the question about young people being worried about having to return to the fundamental Islamic dress codes was this: "We have much more important issues to deal with than to harass our young people about their hair style. It is no one's business how people dress. Why should you belittle the people? There are different types of people within our society... etc". Ahmadinejad said all of this and more because he wanted the people behind his regime if and when the threat of military action against the regime became real. He didn't want Iranians to rise up against his regime whilst his IRGC and the repressive machinery were fighting the Allied Forces.

The threat of military action is off the table for now or for the foreseeable future because there are so many 'I-am-so-besotted-by Khatami and his -La Gioconda smile-so-let's-talk-to-the-Islamic-regime fooled politicians' or 'those who have direct or indirect economic ties with the regime' who have managed to make the regime feel that military action is nye on impossible, the Islamic regime is now concentrating on the domestic battleground- the battleground where it would have most certainly lost the battle to the Iranian people. But now, thanks to those at the UN who managed to take the threat of military action off the table and buy the regime plenty of time, the Islamic regime is getting closer to the nuclear bomb and is taking out any possibilities of revolt by the Iranians.

سئوال: کثیفتر از ملا و آخوند و حامیانشان کیست؟
جواب: آن ایرانیی که باآنها مخالف است اما برای حفظ منافع شخصی خودش ترجیح می دهد آنها را در طول مدت زمان ده قرن -اگر با شتاب عمل کند- اصلاح کند.

On The USA labelling Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) as Terrorists

Amir Taheri is one of few Iranians around who should be listened to and I usually agree with every thing he says. However, on this occasion I don't agree with Amir on his conclusion about whether "A blanket labelling of the IRGC, [as a terrorist organisation] as opposed to targeting elements of it that do mischief against the Iranian people and others in the region and beyond, could prove counterproductive."

Mr Taheri believes that such labeling "could unite a deeply fractious force by leaving it no door through which some of its members could walk out of the dangerous situation they have helped create."

I am not sure how it is possible to determine which part of the IRGC is terrorist and which part isn't! The whole damn organisation is a terrorist entity. From the backbone of it which also includes the brothers, cousins, uncles of IRGC who reside in the West and its affiliates which form the political and economic aspect to the actual armed forces are all terrorist and should be labeled so. The armed forces are already engaged in wars against the international community and will continue regardless of being labeled terrorists. so what would be the point of name calling the forces you are at war with?! Labeling is and should therefore be aimed at those who are not directly involved or are not in the battlefield but in fact are the backbone of the IRGC.

The leaving of doors is precisely what should not be done. The only door left should be an exit door. By calling only parts of the IRGC you are fighting in Lebonan, Iraq and Afghanistan, as terrorists, you leave the backbone to carry on and continue to supply and support their armed forces you are already at war with.

By declaring the whole organisation and its affiliates as terrorists, you ensure that the opportunists put their tails between their legs and run through the exit door fast before they get caught up with. They would do so because they are opportunists who don't really give a damn for Ahmadinejad or Khamenei or even Islam.

The grim reality is this and the world should acknowledge it so that it can deal with it properly:

The medieval Islamists through the mistakes of some of our previous politicians are now sitting on the world's second largest oil revenue - and are on the verge of getting hold of the other second largest oil revenue in Iraq - and as the result have become powerful. They are at war with the free, secular and liberal world. Their grievances are secularism, democracy and liberalism. You cannot negotiate these vital principles with the Jihadists. You cannot reform an ideology that is nothing but a reaction to secularism, democracy and liberalism. The grimmer reality is that it will not go down without a fight. You are therefore inevitably engaged in a war with it. It is not a political game. It is a war. Open your eyes and see. The opportunists including, those who have grievances against their respective Western governments and who directly or indirectly support the terrorists, regardless of the degree and magnitude of their support should get the message loud and clear that the game is over.

Updated 25/08/07

Khatami, the so called reformist during whose presidency more news papers and news agencies were shut down and more reporters and journalists persecuted, and who incidentally has declared his total allegiance to the undemocratic constitution of the Islamic regime and the hardliner Khamenei who himself was a an active militant/terrorist member of IRGC and now the head of it, has this message for his admirers in the American Administration:

"Any action against this [IRGC] institution could further damage the relationship between the Islamic Republic and the USA and create more tension in the region. I remind those [my admirers] in the Administration and congress and anywhere else who protect the interests of the American people and who represent them to stand up against this wrong action and [understand] if any action is taken, there will be no doubt that the wall of distrust between the two countries will be longer and taller."

It is very interesting that Khatami talks about trust! He wants the Americans to trust him and his regime. He mentions the concept of trust. "the wall of distrust". "Trust me, you must trust the Islamic regime" You only get conned when you trust the man who is about to con you. He is the man behind the so called "Dialogue of Civilisations" project. Did the world need that since there is a UN whose primary task is the dialogue between civilisations? Anyhow, Under the new banner of DofC, he called on (conned) the globe to listen to the Islamic regime through his smiles. Many Westerners ,mostly general public, and thence, the desperate vote seeking politicians were well and truly conned and many more will be. The reason for this is the fact that there are so many in the West who are optimistic, peace loving and generally very nice people who welcome anyone, including con artists, who talks peacefully with a smile on his face (not necessarily about peace) and will take his words bona fide. This Khatami has understood well.

Now, let's see if Khatami's American admirers are still listening and will oblige or have they learned their lessons!

Pegah Emambakhsh

Update 28/08/2007
You can follow Pegah's plight on this blog.

UK May Deport Iranian Lesbian to Death Sentence in Tehran on August 23

If you have a blog or post messages to lists and web site concerned with LGBT citizens everywhere and the violations of our human rights, please take some time in the next three days to do something and call attention to the plight of Pegah Emambakhsh, a lesbian from Iran who faces deportation from the UK, and certain danger if returned to the Islamic Republic.

Time is very much of the essence here, as this note makes clear: Pegah faces a flight back to Tehran in just three days:

In a message dated 8/20/2007 3:20:22 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, editorial@ukgaynews.org.uk writes:

... I have just heard that Pegah Emambakhsh is to be deported by the British Government on Thursday August 23 on the British Airways flight to Tehran (BA 6633) which departs from London Heathrow at 21:35. It is 11pm in UK right now, so little chance of getting any further info today. But I will try to get an update Tuesday morning.

I've been asked by Iranians, gay and straight, human rights activists, and friends in San Francisco to get the word out about Pegah's case, especially on political blogs.

Feel free to cut and paste the text here, along with the photos, and share the words and images through your social and web networks.

This story appeared on August 17 in The Star UK:

AN IRANIAN lesbian who faces imprisonment and almost certain death because of her sexuality if sent home back home has been given an 11th hour reprieve [...]

Her supporters from Sheffield ASSIST - the Asylum Seeker Support Initiative - said they were relieved at the news, because for Pegah to be returned to Iran was "tantamount to a death sentence".

Ann Campbell, from ASSIST, said last night: "We are all either on a high or exhausted!

"The plane was taking off at 9.30pm last night and this only started on Monday so it's been a mad four days. Although all we have effectively done is buy some time - we don't know what will happen next - we now have time to get our forces together."

Pegah, who is suffering with mental health problems and suicidal thoughts as a result of the stress, has now been returned to Yarlswood detention centre in Bedford where she was taken after being arrested in Sheffield on Monday [...]

The 40-year-old Iranian - described by those who know her as "charming, incredibly kind, honest and intelligent" - sought asylum in the UK in 2005. She had escaped from her home country after her partner was arrested, tortured, and subsequently sentenced to death by stoning.

Her father was also arrested, interrogated and tortured for information on her whereabouts [...]

She said: "She endured an unhappy arranged marriage, she is filled with guilt about what has happened to her father, and she is not able to see her two sons [...]

The editor of the UK Gay News service, Andy Thayer, has been monitoring the situation and filed a story on Pegah's plight on August 16:

A gay Iranian woman came within minutes of being put onto a non-stop flight to Tehran at Heathrow this evening as the UK Government’s Border and Immigration Agency (BIA) – part of the Home Office – went through the final process of deportation.

It was only the late intervention of the office of Sheffield Central Member of Parliament Richard Caborn – the Minister of Sport – that prevented the deportation today [...]

If returned to Iran, Ms. Emambakhsh faces certain imprisonment and possible execution by stoning. Her ‘crime’ – she was in a lesbian relationship [...]

“The BIA will be committing a serious miscarriage of justice and human rights violation if they insist on Ms Emambhaksh’s deportation,” the group pointed out [...]

And this message from longtime international gay human rights campaigner Peter Tatchell was shared late Monday night

In a message dated 8/20/2007 6:04:51 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, peter@tatchell.freeserve.co.uk writes:

Just to let you all know that I have been working on this case, advising and assisting Pegah's support team on legal issues, campaign strategies, new solicitors, new evidence, expert witnesses, fresh claims and injunctions.

veryone is doing their best. Protests will be helpful, but the legal side is the most crucial right now.

olidarity! Peter.

Eslah-Taliban (Reformists)

The 'Eslah-Taliban' - Farsi term meaning 'Islamic regime reformists', Islamic regime reformists because it has never before been in use in the Farsi language and only has come about since the Islamic regime - are everywhere and closer to you than you would dare to think: next time you visit the laboratory take a little mirror with you and hold it against where the sun never shines from and you will see them there too!! Eslah-Taliban are the winking, eyebrow wriggling, beard stroking chimps, if male, and neck dancing, tail waggling cute little pretty poodles, if female, of the Islamic regime. They are the ones who have kept alive one of the most inept, inadequate, incompatible, and unbelievable regimes that the history of mankind has ever recorded - a regime that would have died of natural causes within 10 political seconds of birth had it not been for the Eslah -Taliban. O yes, they are the ones who have kept feeding the Islamic monster, keeping it alive and warding off any harms that come its way. The Islamic monster would probably die naturally much quicker than you would love to imagine if and once you took away the Eslah-Taliban factor. The Eslah-Talibans have zero power and control of the machinery of the Islamic Regime. They never did and never will. So if you are hoping that they would push away the hardliners one day and take control of the regime, you are like that little camel that dreams of eating cotton seed, sometimes gobbling it and other times seed by seed!* Eslah-Talibans, are like parasites that live off the Islamic regime, their existence depends on the existence of the regime. That is why they ward off any harm that comes in the way of the regime. Eslah-Talab is never meant to take control of the regime: they are meant to guard it from political harm.

Eslah-Talab was coined by the regime soon after the eight year war with Iraq. Iranians had had enough of the war and the regime. The ten year old monster had not had a chance to establish itself. Since its birth, the country had gone from bad to worse and the reason Iranians had not killed it was because of the war with Iraq. Khomeini recognised the importance of the war and even though Saddam Hussein offered a cease-fire two years after the start of the war and when his troops were pushed back to prewar borders, Khomeini insisted on the continuation of the war despite the burden of a huge cost, the benefits in terms of keeping his regime in power longer were also huge. Hence his famous phrase: "keep the oven of the war hot". By the time Khatami, a so called Eslah-talab became the president of the regime, the regime was in trouble. It had not established itself in the way it would had liked to. The damage sustained from the war was far too much for the regime to repair quickly. And in reality, the revolution after 18 years had brought nothing but despair, poverty and death. All the (false) promises of democracy, free electricity, free bread, free this and free that by Khomeini were bursting like soap bubbles. Iranians were ready to explode. On may 23rd, 1997, the regime conceded to appointing (elections in Iran are only puppet shows) an Eslah-Talab as the president. Khatami continued winking, eyebrow wriggling, beard stroking and La Joconde smiling. One day he would talk about democracy to the angry democracy and freedom demanding crowd and a few days later when everything had calmed down he would clarify the situation by declaring his total allegiances to the Islamic constitution, Valih-e-Faghih and the spiritual leader Khamenei. Khatami is nicknamed 'supop' meaning the pressure-releaser.

You will never see another Eslah-Talab in power in the Islamic regime. There is no need for making false promises to keep Iranians at bay. There is no need for a 'supop' safety valve. The regime releases the pressure by public executions, mass arrests for bad Hijab, un-Islamic this and that and by publicly beating and humiliating young Iranians. The monster is well established and is not scared of the angry Iranians any more. All this monster needs to do is to publicly hang a few daring dissidents for crimes never committed or for commitment of acts not punishable by hanging to shut Iranians up. To shut the international community up, it does not need an Eslah-Talab appointed as the president because the monster is very close to its nuclear bomb. All it has to do is to continue the deployment of its chimps and poodles around the globe to dissipate the international community's anger and to suppress its anxiety and to divert its attention from the monster working on its nuclear bomb. Even if a seemingly Eslah-Talab is appointed as the president in the next puppet show presidential election, the monster's policies will remain hardliner.

Eslah-Taliban..Arrrrrghhhh!!!

*This is a Southern Iranian expression. Cotton seeds are camels' favourite dish!


At last....a breakthrough for Iranian pop music: no more domboli cosak!!
Arash Sobhani the lead guitarist, singer, song writer of the group Kiosk, the up and coming rock band, is the man who dared to deviate from the well established lowly 6/8 domboli cosak so revered by the conservative Iranian music producers. The 6/8 rhythm is like the very ugly and environmentally pollutant Paykan the Hilman Hunter car of which the same model was reproduced for over 37 years (1967-2005). The 6/8 rhythm otherwise known in Iran as the domboli cosak (a lowly term) is still very popular amongst some Iranian singers in LA. For goodness sake give it up and move on. Rock on Arash.

two Ministers Replaced and Four Ultra Hardliners appointed

The Islamic regime is increasingly becoming hardliner managed. I say hardliner managed because the full control has always been in the hands of hardliner leaders such as Khamenei, Rafsanjani, Mesbah Yazdi but some - not all - of the lower posts were occupied by some other hardliners with a pinch of conscience, otherwise known as the moderates. Now they are being replaced. Take a look at the below two links.

Iran's President Replaces two Ministers

Iran appoints ultra hardliners to monitor next parliamentary elections

TEHRAN, Iran: Four ultra-hardliners within Iran's ruling establishment have been appointed to a panel monitoring the next legislative elections, the official IRNA news agency reported Sunday, raising fears of foul play in a key vote that could determine the shape of presidential elections a year later.

Ultra-hardliner Ayatollah Ahmad Jannati and three other conservatives viewed as radicals within Iran's Islamic establishment in power since the 1979 Revolution were appointed as members of the panel monitoring legislative elections due next March, the official IRNA news agency said.

Their nomination by Iran's constitutional watchdog, the Guardian Council, sparked fears of mass disqualification of candidates for the race, as was the case in 2004. The four will steer a committee that oversees the elections and approves thousands of other monitors across the country.

The nomination came amid an ongoing power struggle between reformists _who want more overture to the West and less clerical say in running the country_ and hardline conservatives who want clerics to maintain complete control over government matters.

The Guardian Council is a powerful oversight body dominated by hard-line clerics that must approve all parliamentary legislation to become law. It also monitors presidential and parliamentary votes.

The Council barred thousands of reformist hopefuls from running in the previous parliamentary elections in 2004, leading to a low turnout and giving hardliners control of the legislature. Reformists have denounced that vote as a "historical fiasco."

A year later, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was elected to power. But the hardliner has since lost much of his popularity, and reformists are hoping for a comeback if free and fair parliamentary elections take place.

"The appointments (of ultra-hardliners) increase fears that mass disqualification of reformist candidates will happen again," said former reformist lawmaker Jafar Kambouzia.

به این خبر توجه کنید:

خبرگزاري فارس: مائده، عروس 16 ساله‌اي كه متهم به قتل شوهرش است صبح امروز به خريد قرص برنج و دادن آن به شوهرش اعتراف كرد.
به گزارش خبرنگار اجتماعي فارس، صبح روز 16 ارديبهشت ماه سال جاري ماموران گشت آگاهي تهران از فوت مشكوك يك مرد به دليل مسموميت با خبر شدند.
با حضور ماموران و روشن بازپرس شعبه سوم كشيك قتل تهران در بيمارستان و بررسي صحنه مشخص شد كه متوفي فردي 23 ساله به نام احمد است كه طبق اظهارات همسرش به دليل نامشخصي مسموم و سپس به بيمارستان منتقل شده‌است.
روشن در خصوص اين پرونده به خبرنگار اجتماعي فارس، گفت: در اظهارات زن متوفي به تناقضاتي برخورد كرديم كه با بررسي بيشتر مشخص شد اين زوج با يكديگر مشكل خانوادگي داشته‌اند.
وي ادامه داد: با بازجويي از همسر متوفي مشخص شد وي با پسر جواني ارتباط داشته و در روز قبل از فوت همسرش با متوفي درگيري شديدي داشته‌است.
بازپرس شعبه سوم كشيك قتل تهران ادامه داد: مائده در اعترافات اوليه خود مدعي شد كه دو عدد قرص برنج را در ليوان آب حل كرده و به احمد داده است در حالي كه مدعي بود قرص برنج را از يكي از اقوام مقتول گرفته و اطلاع نداشته كه قرص برنج است و خيال مي‌كرده است كه قرص ويتامين است.
روشن افزود: صبح امروز مائده در اعترافي تكان دهنده مدعي شد كه با نقشه قبلي و براي از سر راه برداشتن شوهرش براي رسيدن به پسر مورد علاقه‌اش به عطاري رفته و قرص برنج را تهيه كرده و به همسرش داده است.
وي خاطر نشان كرد: تحقيقات براي مشخص شدن زواياي نامعلوم پرونده هنوز ادامه دارد.

به نظر شما چه کسی مقصر اصلی این فاجعه است؟
1- خود عروس؟
2- رژیم و فرهنگ اسلامی؟
3- عطاری که قرص برنج را می فروشد؟
4- همه این ها؟

اگر فقر و بدبختی که رژیم اسلامی در جامعه ترویج کرده نبود؛ اگر فرهنگ اسلامی که دختر بچه های زیر 18 سال را عروس می کند نبود؛ اگر رژیم اسلامی مدیریت صحیح میدانست چیست و فروش قرص های برنج که تا کنون باعث مرگ بسیاری از افراد شده را ممنوع می کرد؛ اگر قوانین اسلامی زنها و مردانی را که از زندگی زناشویی خود راضی نیستند سنگسار نمی کرد؛ و خیلی اگر های دیگر که همه برمیگردند به رژیم و فرهنگ اسلامی به احتمال بسیار قوی وقوع چنین فاجعه هایی در جامعه ما بسیار کمتر بود. اما از رژیمی که تمام دغدغه اش نجات اسلام نوع خودشان و فدا کردن ایران و هفتاد میلیون ایرانی در این راه است هرگز نمی توان انتظاری غیر از این داشت.

خاک عالم بر سر آن ایرانیی که با این رژیم که ایران وطنش نبوده و هرگز نخواهد بود همکاری میکند. تو ای ایرانی وطن فروش که با یک مشت اخوندی که قلبشان حتی یکبار برای ایران نمی تپد به هر طریقی همکاری می کنی, خاک عالم بر سرت. هرگز نگو که ایرانی هستی و مطمئن باش که هم خودت و هم نسلت را از ایران بر خواهیم انداخت. ایران جای ایرانی است و بس. ایران جای ایرانیی است که میهن پرست است و برای آبادانی ایران نفس می کشد.