Mr Obama please tell me how are you going to put an end to terrorism?

Ayatullah Khamenei's reply to Obama's Norooz message to the Iranian people and the regime was immediate. Khamenei said Inter Alia: " [We] don't see any real change in America's behaviour toward Iran, when we see that we will change our behaviour toward America." Khamenei did not take his time to consider Obama's offer. That alone should indicate to Obama that his proposed negotiations are going to be tough. Khamenei's position is very clear: He cannot compromise with the U.S.A. His stance on America cannot not change. The chants of "death to America" is not going to ever stop as it is not about the actual death to the country but rather America's way of life as it is anti-Islamic and the Mullahs seek the death of America's values. The demands that America pulls out of the region will remain. And the rest of the regime's demands will not be compromised. The Mullahs know well if they concede to the Americans, they will be finished. So it will be America who must oblige. That's what the regime is saying.

Apart from all the other negatives resulting from Obama's desire to talk to the Islamic regime which according to his own admission will take a long time - one being the giving of more valuable time to the regime to enrich uranium to the level required for making a bomb - Obama's willingness to negotiate and talk to the Islamic regime, a regime that sponsors terrorism abroad and terrorises Iranians seeking freedom at home is a departure from the international community's usual stance on terrorism. You cannot negotiate with and make concessions to those who sponsor terrorism or choose the terror method rather than a civilised manner of advocacy for their cause. If you make concessions to terrorists you encourage further future terrorism by different radical groups. You may manage to make peace with those presently terrorising for their cause but you will have also set a precedent that terrorism pays dividend if pursued persistently and rigorously.

It is these populist policies that will ensure the continuation of terrorism. I have no doubt that we shall see the sparkle in the evil eye of the terrorist at the end of Obama's adventures with the Islamic regime.

The Reason Khatami Pulled Away From Elections?

When Khatami changed his mind about his candidacy for the presidential elections in June, no one was sure why he did that as most people believed he would win the election. The reasons given by him and those around him are not convincing and many hopeful Iranians are hurt by that!


He is considered as a pragmatist and the only relatively powerful Mullah in Iran the West could come to any reasonable agreement if that is at all possible. He is the only Mullah that uses the Western style language when he talks about democracy and human rights. Even though he vehemently expresses his total support and dedication to the Islamic regime and in particular the Valih-e- Faghih (supreme leader) in almost every speech he makes, many Iranians still blindly believe that if the regime is at all reformable, it would be through Khatami and no one else. The eight years of his presidency is not enough to convince these people that he is both unable to deliver his promises of reform and that he does not wish to change the nature of the regime, i.e. reform the constitution and amend it so that the the supreme leader doe not have the supreme power.


The present political juncture with Obama committing America to talk to the regime and the West's desperation to make a deal with the Islamic Republic is what Khatami finds awkward. The problem is that the conditions of the talks are not acceptable by the Islamic regime and the supreme leader, Ayatullah Ali Khamenie. And Khatami does not want to be involved in negotiations that would show he is not really any different to the rest of the Mullahs. In essence he is not different but he has manged to find a place in the people's hearts and minds as a reasonable Mullah. It is all to do with the way he talks, his expressions, and the role of the good cop he plays that the regime has found so useful. We have nick named him: the supop. (the safety valve) Whether he decided against running for the presidency or he was told to do so by the supreme leader is irrelevant. The point is that the result of the upcoming presidential elections won't make any difference to the proposed negotiations by Obama. The fact that Khatami, the only Mullah the West expects to behave in a civilised manner is no longer there and that can only mean the position of the Islamic regime won't change after the elections.

.

سال نو خجسته باد نوروزتان پیروز

چهار شنبه سوری

چهارشنبه سوریه ... یه... یه




----------








در مورد حاجی فیروز همیشه چندین سوال در ذهن من بوجود آمده: آیا نام واقعی این شخصیت تاریخی همیشه حاجی فیروز بوده؟ آیا آین شخصیت همیشه چهره اش را سیاه می کرده و یا رنگهای دیگری مانند سرخ؟ آیا شعری که می خواند همیشه این بوده؟

ارباب خودم سامبولي بليکم
ارباب خودم سر تو بالا کن
ارباب خودم بز بز قندي
ارباب خودم چرا نمي خندي؟
حاجي فيروزم
سالي يه روزم

سوال بعدی چرا لباس زنانه ؟؟

حاجی؟؟؟ این شاید از زمان اشغال ایران از اسلام باشد. من فکر می کنم همینطوره. بعد چهره سیاه در رابطه با شعری که می خواند «ارباب خودم« نشانگر بردگی است. بردگان اعراب از سیاهان آفریقایی بوده اند. پس عمو نوروز ارباب و حاجی فیروز برده اوست؟
به نظر من (هیچ پژوهشی انجام ندادم و فقط به عقل خود مراجعه می کنم) رنگ سیاه حاجی فیروز در حقیقت سرخآب است و ذغال نیست. سرخابی که همسر عمو نوروز صورتش را با آن آرایش می کرده.

شاید بعد از ورود اسلام به ایران کم کم همسر بابا نوروز بخاطر قوانین و سنت های ضد زن خانه نشین و از این کارها منع شد و جایش را حاجی فیروز گرفت؟؟

به نظر من عاقلانه تر و با شناختی اندکی که از فرهنگ ایرانیان باستان دارم عمو نوروز همان بابا نوروز است و حاجی فیروز همسر بابا نوروز یعنی ماما نوروز است.

لباس زنانه حاجی فیروز هم دال بر این استدلال عقلانی است که حاجی فیروز همان ماما نوروز است.

کدام به نظر عقلانی تر می رسد:
عمو نوروز و حاجی فیروز؟
یا
بابا نوروز و ماما نوروز؟


Every year Iranians have celebrated the last Tuesday of the year by making fires and jumping over them, singing and dancing. The islamic regime has tried to suppress that and declared that since it is not mentioned in the Quran it is not Islamic and it should be banned. However, the ceremony has become even more magnificent.

Demonstration in London Against Islamic Law

حدود 600 نفر تظاهر کننده در میدان ترفولگار لندن گرد هم آمدند تا بر علیه قوانین شرع اسلامی اعتراض کنند. آنها بعد بسوی میدان رد لیون به حرکت آمدند و در مسیر راهپیمایی صد ها نفر دیگر به آنا ملحق شدند تا در رابطه با قوانین شرع اسلامی, آپارتاید و قوانین
ضد زن گفتگو کنند. خبر این تظاهرات از سوی بی بی سی رادیو 4 و بی بی سی 5 و بی بی سی ولز و تایمز گزارش شد.

در این تظاهرات ای سی گریلینگ عنوان کرد "وقتی شما یک جامعه را تکه تکه می کنید و وقتی که شما به گروه های مختلف در یک جامعه اجازه می دهید تا استانداردهای مختلفی را به اجرا درآورند آنگاه شما با بی عدالتی هایی مواجه می شوید که حقوق زن در آن بیشترمختوش می شود. ما باید برای نگهداری از یک قانون برای همه تلاش و مبارزه کنیم"

پریسا که درخواست طلاقش از سوی همسر بی رحم و خشنش رد شده بود گفت " ده سال از عمرم بخاطر قوانین شرعی اسلامی تباه شد. من می خواهم آنرا متوقف کنم. آن عادلانه نیست. من یک عموی مهربان داشتم که به من کمک کرد تا فرار کنم اما خیلی ها هستند که توان فرار ندارند و من خودم شاهد خیلی از آنها بودم."

تری ساندرسون, رئیس انجمن ملی سکولار گفت " ما نیازی به یک سیستم قانونی دیگری نداریم که در موازات سیستم اصلی باشد. قوانین شرعی اسلامی آهسته آهسته دارد به قوانین کشور رخنه می کند و ما باید آنرا در مسیرش متوقف کنیم."

فریبرز پویا رئیس انجمن ایرانیان سکولار گفت "قبول قوانین شرعی اسلامی یعنی خیانت به هزاران زن و کودک و رها کردن آنها در دستان بی رحم گروه های اسلامی است"

بعد از سخنان چند تن دیگر منجمله سرگول احمد - جلیل جلیلی - شیوا محبوبی - رضا مرادی- مریم نمازی - سعید پارتو - شیلا شریفی و بهرام سروش, تظاهر کنندگان با شعارهای خود خواهان پایان دادن به قوانین شرعی اسلامی در انگلستان و دیگر جاها شدند.

مریم نمازی در مسیر راه چنین گفت : " ما بی کار نخواهیم نشست و اجازه نخوایم داد تا دولت انگلیس یک قسمت از جامعه را بدست دادگاه های شرم آور و قوانین عقب افتاده بدهد تا تعدادی اسلامیست های افراطی را خشنود کند و ما اسلامیست ها را در انگلستان, ایران و جاهای دیگر بزانو خواهیم آمورد ." وی اضافه کرد " ما هر روز به تعداد و قدرتمان اضافه می شود و بالخره از شر شوراهای شرعی اسلامی و دادگاه های شرعی خلاص خواهیم شد."

Source
منبع خبر

Hat Tip Banafshe Zand-Bonazzi

دختر بد حجاب !!!! از دست ماموران رژیم با کمک مردم فرار می کند.

هنگامی که مردم متحد می شوند و به کمک یکدیگر می شتابند مانند این صحنه در ویدیوی زیر, مزدوران رژیم نمی توانند هیچ غلطی بکنند. آنها هرگز بخاطر دستگیری یک جوان برای حجابش یا موی سرش حاظر نیستند که شورشی بشود و در برابر مقاومت گسترده مردم عقب نشینی می کنند.

زبان پارسی یا فارسی یا زبان رسمی ایرانی

آیا زبان رسمی کشور باید پارسی خالص باشد؟

همانطور که می دانیم زبان مادری همه ما ایرانیان پارسی خالص نیست. همانطور که همه ما ایرانیان پرشین نیستیم: ما در ایران عرب, ترک, کرد, لر, بلوچ, گیلانی, مازندرانی و پارس داریم که همه آنها زبان مادری خود را دارند. زبان مادری هم همه می دانیم تا چه اندازه برای بیان احساسات واقعی فرد مهم است. زبان رسمی از سوی دیگر معمولا فاقد احساسات واقعی شخص است و بیشتر برای موارد سیاسی , اجتماعی, علمی و پژوهشی بکار برده می شود. زبان رسمی برای یک کشوری مثل ایران که مجموعه ای از زبان ها و نژادهای مختلفی است ضروری است و به نظر من چنین زبانی لزومن نباید زبان خاص و خالص یکی از نژادهایی که در ایران زندگی می کنند باشد. زبان فارسی از گذشته های بسیار دور زبان رسمی ایران بوده و اینچنین هم حتمن باقی خواهد ماند. اما پا فشاری بر خالص کردن این زبان رسمی به نظر من کار درستی نیست. از اینرو من معتقدم که زبان رسمی ایرانیان که اکنون فارسی است نه تنها نباید پارسی خاص باشد بلکه می باید با مرور زمان برای رسا تر شدن و کاملتر شدن از دیگر زبان های نژاد های ایرانی منجمله عربی نیز استفاده ببرد.

اما این به این معنا نیست که من مخالف پارسی خالص هستم. من خود پارسی اصیل هستم و معتقدم که زبان مادریم نیز بهتر است خالص باقی بماند و از تمام پارسیانی که برای خالص کردن زبان مادریشان تلاش می کنند قدر دانی می کنم. همینطور باید بگویم که من به این هم واقفم که بسیاری از ایرانیان معتقدند که پاک کردن لغات زبان عربی از زبان رسمی ایران نوعی مبارزه با رژیم اسلامی است که بنیادینی اسلامی و عربی است. به نظر من بهتر است این هم میهنان مبارز عزیزم مواظب باشند تا با سعی در خالص کردن زبان رسمی کشور ناخودآگاه نوعی نژادپرستی و جدایی بین ایرانیان بوجود نیاورند. یا موضع خود را بوضوح مشخص کنند که آنها با دیگر زبانهای ایرانیان منجمله زبان عرب های خوزستان موردی ندارند و فقط در تلاشند تا زبان مادری پارسی خود را خالص کنند.

این مطلب یا مطالب دیگری که در این وبلاگ می نویسم مطالبی نیستند که در آنها احساساتم را بیان میکنم بنابراین از زبان فارسی رسمی استفاده می کنم.

روز جهاني زن

روزجهاني زن را به تمام زنان ودختران ايران شادباش مي گوييم.

نگاهي به تاريخچه ي روز جهاني زن در ايران
بخش اول

بخش دوم

بخش سوم

VOA Persian TV: Antiwar.com

I watched Voice of America Persian TV today and on the Round table programme was Eric Garris the founder of the Antiwar.com website. I have never seen anything like it. The guy dodged every question put to him by the presenter, Vafa Mostaghim reading messages from the Iranians who live inside the Islamic Republic of Iran. Toward the end of the show one Iranian sent an email and congratulated Garris for talking in the way that Khamenei in his wildest dreams could never do to propagate his regime and defend its policies of war and jihad. He gave a very nervous chuckle to that and had the cheek to ask Iranians to donate to his website! I think he missed the irony.

Garris showed his ignorance about what is happening in Iran throughout the show. The level of his ignorance about Iran was actually embarrassing. Iran is not a remote country that no one has heard of. She was one of the main campaigning points of the US presidential election. This dude has set up Antiwar.com campaign and knows jack about a country that his beloved country is at loggerheads with at the moment. He has not bothered himself to read and educate himself about what is really happening in Iran; who is in charge; how elections are just a meaningless show; how Ahmadinejad came to be the president; and what the Islamic regime stands for. He told Iranians that he was against the American government interfering in other parts of the world. This he repeated in various forms as the answers to most of the questions. He then told Iranians inside Iran how proud he was to be American. What makes him proud to be American? The freedom he has to set up a site and criticise his government and stop it from interfering in other countries? Something that Iranians certainly cannot do. Iranians inside Iran cannot protest against the regime regularly sending millions of $$ Iranian money to the terrorist groups of Hamas and Hizbullah, whilst over 40% (regime's own statistics) of Iranians live below the poverty line.... ..Maybe he is so proud of his freedom that he only wants it for himself?! Garris said on the show that it was not up to America to help Iranians to freedom.

This dude's anti war campaign isn't about innocent people dying. This dude doesn't give two hoots about innocent people dying. If he did, he would also campaign for those innocent people who are killed by their brutal regimes. He doesn't give a damn about innocent Iranians being slaughtered by the Islamic regime. He just doesn't want to help Iranians to have freedom. He is from the category of Americans who would not only do nothing but do everything to destroy other's freedom. Like the ones who destroyed our one year old democracy 55 years ago. Those who believe freedom belongs to the Americans and the West only. This dude believes America should only have economic ties with Iran with no questions asked. He confessed on the programme that he was actually a Conservative..a Republican.

War is so horrible that you could stand at the corner of the street and shout stop the war all day and people would applaud you and even donate money to your cause. What a great earner that is? War is so horrible that you could in fact make loads of money if you start a stop the war campaign like Garris has done. Garris claimed that over 100,000 people visit his website. I was surprised because any anti war campaign should be so popular that millions not thousands should visit these sites. I believe Antiwar.com is more of a money making machine than just a humanitarian cause. One thing is for sure is that Antiwar.com receives a lot of money as donations from around the world. Perhaps even some from those rogue dictatorial regimes that feel the Americans breathing down their necks. I bet there are many Americans who are green with envy that this so and so got there first.

Khamenei was appointed as Vali-e-Faghih based on Rafsanjani lying to Majles-e-Khobregan.

In a recent televised program on BBC 2, Hashemi Rafsanjani was also interviewed. In his interview, Rafsanjani said that when Khomeini died, the Islamic Republic had to choose a Vali-e-Faghih. According to Hashemi rafsanjani, there was no one and Khomeini had not appointed anyone before his death. He said (paraphrase) however, two people who were always with him in private were himself and Khamenei. When the Majles-e-Khobregan had to choose a Vali-e-Faghih, he told the Khobregan that during one of his private meetings with Khomeini they had brought up the issue that Khomeini had not chosen his successor. To which Khomeini said to them (Rafsanjani and Khamenei) that Khamenei should be appointed as his successor. The program showed a clip where he actually talked to the Khobregan and told them what Khomeini had said during that private meeting and suggested that Khamenei should be appointed. After his suggestion, the majority of the Mullahs and Ayatulahs in Khobregan voted for Khamenei as they believed Rafsanjani. After Ahmadinejad was appointed as the President of the Islamic Republic, Ahmadinejad started to throw his weight around and threatened to expose and even bring to justice - no matter what position they had in the Islamic Republic - those who had through corruption and abuse of their positions mounted wealth and power. Everyone knew who he was referring to. He was talking about Rafsanjani. Rafsanjani's relationship with his old mate Khamenei was also strained at the time. Rafsanjani, in return threatened to reveal some facts that would rock the regime. Ahmadinejad never took any further action against Rafsanjani and things calmed down.

What Rafsanjani said wittingly or unwittingly in that interview broadcast by BBC 2, in my opinion, is what that secret revelation was: the fact that Khamenei was appointed because Khobregan was influenced by that suggestion and that's how Khamenei is now the number one power in Iran.

Rafsanjani lied about Khomeini suggesting Khamenei as his successor.